
- Visual studio 2008 install moq how to#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq full#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq code#
- Visual studio 2008 install moq free#
Visual studio 2008 install moq code#
If you are don't want to mix samples & code in the same project then just make sure in your build you copy the files to the correct locations.
Visual studio 2008 install moq how to#
This is also a good idea, because it will show people how to use your tasks. In this example I will be demonstrating a task from my open source tasks at The task is one that was contributed by Grant Holliday.įirst in the project where your tasks are contained create a folder that will be used to contain sample MSBuid files that can be used to debug the tasks. In this post I will describe how to easily an effectively debug MSBuild tasks that you are creating.
Visual studio 2008 install moq free#
We appreciate deeply any feedback that you may have! Feel free to participate in the chat, or report an issue in the issue tracker.A question that comes up pretty frequently is "How can I debug an MSBuild task"? It's actually pretty simple.

Visual studio 2008 install moq full#

Not using Record/Replay also means that it's straightforward to move common expectations to a fixture setup method and even override those expectations when needed in a specific unit test. When it was conceived, it was the only mocking library that went against the generalized and somewhat unintuitive (especially for novices) Record/Replay approach from all other libraries (and that might have been a good thing )). Its API design helps even novice users to fall in the "pit of success" and avoid most common misuses/abuses of mocking.

Moq is designed to be a very practical, unobtrusive and straight-forward way to quickly setup dependencies for your tests. Moq achieves all this by taking full advantage of the elegant and compact C# and VB language features collectively known as LINQ (they are not just for queries, as the acronym implies). It's the result of feeling that the barrier of entry from other mocking libraries is a bit high, and a simpler, more lightweight and elegant approach is possible. Most developers in this situation also happen to be quite pragmatic and adhere to state (or classic) TDD. The library was created mainly for developers who aren't currently using any mocking library (or are displeased with the complexities of some other implementation), and who are typically manually writing their own mocks (with more or less "fanciness"). Its API is extremely simple and straightforward, and doesn't require any prior knowledge or experience with mocking concepts.

And it supports mocking interfaces as well as classes. NET Linq expression trees and lambda expressions, which makes it the most productive, type-safe and refactoring-friendly mocking library available. NET developed from scratch to take full advantage of. Moq (pronounced "Mock-you" or just "Mock") is the only mocking library for. You can think of Linq to Mocks as "from the universe of mocks, give me one whose behavior matches this expression".Ĭheckout the Quickstart for more examples! What? If you really want to go beyond state testing and want to // verify the mock interaction instead. Simply assert the returned state: Assert. Exercise the instance returned by Mock.Of by calling methods on it.
